4 posts tagged “wealth”
Let’s spend some time discussing wealth and what the Bible has to say on this subject. It seems our society has become focused on wealth and becoming rich. We’re constantly reminded in this world that being rich is a good and desirable goal. We see this in the Wall Street Journal and listed on the Fortune 500. We read about it in daily newspapers and listen to ‘experts’ talk about wealth on programs such as CNN and Fox News. Most of us invest in the stock market with the hopes that we’ll one day strike it rich or at least receive high enough returns to retire comfortably. American CEO’s are the highest paid corporate leaders in the world with some earning 400-500 times what the average worker takes home. If you’re like me and have managed a business whether on your own or for a corporation, then you know that in today’s world, you’re only as good as your last week, month, quarter, year. Have a good week? Great, now have a good quarter. Have a good quarter? Spend an hour celebrating and then focus on the year. Have a good year? Better start planning a strategy to do even better next year. If you are successful, you receive rewards in the form of raises, bonuses, better benefits, etc. Have you ever wondered, as I have, whether all the time spent on the pursuit of business/working success is worth the time? Of course you don’t need to manage a business to feel the stress of the working world today. All of us are concerned with earning more money, working our way up, receiving better benefits…..and we’re all concerned with job security considering that we could be ‘downsized’, ‘reassigned’ or fired due to ‘synergies’ created by a merger. Even if you’ve been successful and have reached your financial goals, my guess is that you’ve reached the goal and thought - ‘Is this it?’ It probably hasn’t been as satisfying as you thought it would be. Regardless, it’s as though we’re all on this big treadmill that seems to be going faster and faster and we can’t get off and we can’t slow down. It’s as though someone is dangling a carrot in front of our faces that we can never quite reach. What does the Bible teach us about the pursuit of wealth. “But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with that. People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.” (1 Timothy 6:8-10) The Bible teaches us that money isn’t the root of all evil (as is often quoted), but the love of money. If you believe that everything in the world is the Lord’s and you’re simply a steward of His possessions, then you won’t fall into the devil’s trap of falling in love with money and wealth. If you begin to view your money as only yours, to do with as you please, then you are starting down a dark path....which is what we, as a nation, have done. Since public corporations seem to make up over 90% of what we read about in the business world, let’s take a moment and look at the decisions they make and why they make those decisions. As I’ve mentioned before, I have some experience with corporate decision-making. I’ve never been a CEO of a company, but like many others in middle management, I’ve had to execute senior management decisions within my area of responsibility. Let’s start by asking some basic, high level questions. What is the purpose of a corporation? What are the goals of a corporation? What influences the majority of high level decisions within a company? Don’t worry, I won’t go into a long-winded discussion on microeconomics and financial statements. For our purposes here, we’ll stick to the basics. Obviously, public companies are focused on their stock price and the company’s return to shareholders. Companies initially issue stock in return for capital (cash) that they can use to grow their business, invest in research, etc. They want their stock price to rise so that their shareholders are satisfied and that, in return, benefits the employees of the company in many ways…increased salary, bonuses, stock options, career advancement, etc. The stock price is the focus of any publicly traded company. It is certainly the focus of anyone who invests in stocks or mutual funds. Have you ever thought about what really affects stock prices? The answer is ....just about everything. Obviously, how well a company is performing financially and operationally impacts their stock price. The problem with stocks is that there are many other things that affect their prices - scandals, fraud, wars, terrorist activity, the overall economy, the overall stock market, interest rates, inflation, Federal Reserve decisions, Federal legislation, etc. If a big investment institution (private equity funds, hedge funds or the big Wall St. banks) buys or sells a big chunk of stock in a company, they have the power to raise or lower the price to some degree (regardless of what you're told, all investors are not the same). Mergers & acquisitions can have a big impact on stock prices. So, even though our society consistently tells us that we should invest in stocks because of past history (we always hear about past 5, 10, 30 years trends), does the past really give us a true indication of the future? As it relates to something as risky as the stock market, the past has absolutely no bearing on the future. Yes, you can see trends, but you can't see if a war is going to break-out tomorrow. You can't see if a terrorist event is going to happen tomorrow. Did 9/11 affect your checking account or savings account? Did the value of your CD's drop? No. How did your stocks do? We are blindly following flawed advice that says you have to invest in stocks in order to save for retirement. The has invested trillions in the stock market. Where is our faith? Are you placing faith in things of this world or your Creator? What do you think God sees when He looks at the stock market? I have an idea - greed. The truth is that the stock market is a house of cards and it's going to fall. How? I don't know specifically, but remember, only one card (a negative event) needs to fall for the whole house to come down. For simplicity, if we were to point to one, overriding factor in a company’s stock price, I believe it would be growth. Stock analysts always point to a company’s sales/revenue growth, profit growth, prospects for growth, hindrances to growth, etc. when discussing stocks. Sales and revenue must continue to grow at an acceptable level (10%, 20%, 30+%), profits must grow, etc……in order for investors to continue to invest in a company’s stock. If you’re a CEO of a publicly traded company, you’re focused on (among many other things) how to grow your business through internal growth, acquisitions, etc., while keeping costs as low as possible. You're constantly under pressure to find ways to grow your business. You can't just run a nice profitable business, you must get bigger. The treadmill never stops running. So, with these things in mind, let’s answer the questions above. What is the purpose of any corporation? We could say that companies provide products and services that benefit us…and that’s a good thing. This is certainly true for some companies, but the one overriding purpose for any publicly traded company is to make money. If you aren’t profitable, how long will your investors continue to support you? I think the Dot Com bust of 2000 showed us the answer. If you have a great idea, you better turn the idea into a profitable business within a couple of years (depending on the industry) or you’re going to find yourself under ever increasing pressure to do so. What are the goals of a corporation? Every publicly traded company has operational and financial objectives that will meet or exceed expectations. They must meet sales, revenue, cost and profit expectations or their stock could decline. What influences decisions within the company? Most high level decisions revolve around whether the outcome of these decisions will have a positive or negative impact on these same metrics – sales, revenue, costs and profits. If we step back for a moment and really think about what drives corporations and their decisions, we see one overriding theme - the pursuit of money. What does the Bible say about spending our lives in pursuit of money? God's Word is clear - pursue God, not money. The love and pursuit of money will lead you into all kinds of evil. If you're wondering how corporations can do evil, you won't have to look far. Remember, the measuring stick is not the world - don't compare yourself or your business to the world and think you're a-ok. The measuring stick is God's Word. Pollution, deforestation, fraud, embezzlement, bribes, 'creative' accounting, oppressing the poor, pursuit of profits above all else, etc. Think about the structure of a corporation. The people at the top are usually wealthy, while the people at the bottom struggle to get by. In fact, corporations are consistently rewarded for paying the lowest wages possible (an example is outsourcing) regardless of whether they are doing fine financially. Yes, people with more responsibility should make more, but not 400 times more and not at the expense of others. Every time you read about layoffs, outsourcing or 'downsizing', who usually loses their jobs? Those at the bottom of the corporate ladder are usually the most affected. Who usually benefits? The people at the top. Wall Street normally applauds these 'cost reductions'....which many times leads to more compensation to those making these decisions. They never mention the lives that are turned upside down because of these decisions. For weeks now (April 2007), I have been reading about how the downturn in the subprime market is causing a spike in foreclosures and mortgage company bankrupcies. Many articles have discussed how this could trickle down to affect many areas of the economy. Not one article I have seen (in the Wall St. Journal or other publications) has discussed the impact to the families who are being evicted due to the foreclosures. I'm sure their are many reasons for the problems - people taking on too much debt, economic downturn in some areas, overzealous mortgage salespeople & companies, etc., but this is how the world looks at things. Very rarely do we read about the human cost. This cost doesn't affect the bottom line. The corporate working world can chew you up and spit you out. God tells us this in His Word - you and I are going to have problems throughout our time on earth (work included). The difference for those that believe in Him is that we know He's watching over us. We will always receive what we need according to His will. ‘Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said, "Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you."’ (Hebrews 13:5) With all of this said, let’s ask the toughest question of all – is it easy to run a company in today's world based on the principles in God’s Word? I believe the short answer is no. Why? Because the #1 focus of most companies is the pursuit of money. If you were to listen to any publicly traded company’s quarterly earnings call, would the CEO begin talking about how they were following God’s plan? Would the CEO talk about how their success this quarter contributed to the company’s ability to give back to God? It seems a little strange to us to even suggest something like this. In today’s world, we inherently want to separate our working world from our personal world. We don’t think in terms of blessing and cursing as it applies to the companies we work for. Why? We like to think that if I live my personal life according to God’s Word, it’s ok if I let things slip when making decisions for my company. The truth is that God asks us to stand against our enemy in every aspect of our life. One of the benefits of forming a corporation is that employees of the corporation are shielded from liability (this changed to some degree with the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, but we won’t go into details here). If a defect on a car causes an accident, the people involved in the accident don’t personally sue the CEO of the company who built the car, they sue the corporation. This is one of the ‘benefits’ of creating a corporation. In the same way, we feel that God (I was certainly included) wouldn’t ask us to stand against such overwhelming worldly thinking and actions at work. What if we were fired because we didn’t conform? Instead of relying on Him, we rely on ourselves and worry about how the world will react. Never forget, the world wants you to conform to its way of thinking and our workplace is just another conduit for our enemy to get to us. The Bible tells us that we must stand against our enemy - always. God is always faithful and will provide for us. Let’s look at an example. If you’ve read my initial letters, then you know that I spent a few years working for a cable company. When our company launched our services in , we had a few ‘adult’ channels as part of our channel lineup. I simply accepted this as part of being in this business. A couple of years after we launched, our company decided to launch ‘level 2’ adult channels. These are more graphic and the price is higher. I held out on offering these channels until we were the only division without them. Eventually, I gave in because ‘every other division offered them’ and they offered us more ‘revenue’. Once the Lord began to change me, I no longer viewed these channels as ‘revenue’. I viewed them as they truly were – a way for our enemy to lead people down dark paths. What came to mind for me was this – a family man who has never viewed pornography sees an ad for the Playboy channel late at night while watching ESPN. He decides to order one movie…which leads to other movies and possibly the Internet. After awhile, his wife discovers that he’s viewing these things and ……you can guess the rest. All of us are susceptible to this temptation (yes gentlemen, the Lord knows we are weak in this area. He created us to be visual, but only to look at our wives!). If someone is not a strong believer in God, all they need is a little push to get hooked on this stuff. Ask any pastor and they’ll tell you how damaging pornography can be. It can destroy marriages, families, homes. “Your eye is the lamp of your body. When your eyes are good, your whole body also is full of light. But when they are bad, your body also is full of darkness.” (Luke 11:34). Of course, it only starts out with a movie. This is how the enemy works. It became very clear that I was going right along with the plan. I can tell you that it is a very sobering moment when you see that you are being used by the enemy. Would I have felt responsible if the marriage of someone I knew ended because I decided to show these movies? Of course not, I’m simply trying to earn a living – who am I to push my values on someone else? This line of reasoning doesn’t make much sense to me now. I thought I was doing ok in this world, but I was not strong enough to resist our enemy because I was relying on my own understanding and strength…I failed time and again to resist. “Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make your paths straight.” (Proverbs 3:5-6) Once I began following the Lord, I was led to this verse: "Return, faithless people," declares the LORD, "for I am your husband. I will choose you—one from a town and two from a clan—and bring you to . Then I will give you shepherds after my own heart, who will lead you with knowledge and understanding.” (Jeremiah 3:14-15) Let’s briefly take a look at a few Bible verses that comment on wealth and the pursuit of wealth: “Then Jesus said to his disciples, I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 19:23-24) Is Jesus telling us that if you are wealthy it is impossible to enter God’s kingdom? No. It is difficult for wealthy people to enter heaven because in most cases, wealth and the pursuit of riches becomes their master. They put their pursuit of wealth ahead of God and money becomes the focus of their lives. Are we warned about this? Absolutely. "No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.” (Matthew 6:24) How do you know who you’re serving? It’s not hard. If God asked you to give up everything as part of His plan for you, could you do it? Be honest. Two years ago I could not have done it. If you seek God and allow Him to change you, money will no longer be your master because He will give you true faith. The Lord may bless you with wealth, but you’ll view it as His – you will only be a steward of His money to use for His kingdom. This is how you determine whether money is your master. Do you view it as yours or His? We are given many warnings about pursuing wealth: “Looking at his disciples, he said: "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you who hunger now, for you will be satisfied. Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. Blessed are you when men hate you, when they exclude you and insult you and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of "Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven. For that is how their fathers treated the prophets. "But woe to you who are rich, for you have already received your comfort. Woe to you who are well fed now, for you will go hungry. Woe to you who laugh now, for you will mourn and weep.” (Luke 6:20-25) Don’t let the riches and pleasures of this world keep you from maturing spiritually: “While a large crowd was gathering and people were coming to Jesus from town after town, he told this parable: "A farmer went out to sow his seed. As he was scattering the seed, some fell along the path; it was trampled on, and the birds of the air ate it up. Some fell on rock, and when it came up, the plants withered because they had no moisture. Other seed fell among thorns, which grew up with it and choked the plants. Still other seed fell on good soil. It came up and yielded a crop, a hundred times more than was sown." When he said this, he called out, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear." His disciples asked him what this parable meant. He said, "The knowledge of the secrets of the has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, so that, " 'though seeing, they may not see; though hearing, they may not understand.' "This is the meaning of the parable: The seed is the word of God. Those along the path are the ones who hear, and then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved. Those on the rock are the ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root. They believe for a while, but in the time of testing they fall away. The seed that fell among thorns stands for those who hear, but as they go on their way they are choked by life's worries, riches and pleasures, and they do not mature. But the seed on good soil stands for those with a noble and good heart, who hear the word, retain it, and by persevering produce a crop.” (Luke 8:4-15) This is another parable that certainly applies to us today: Then he said to them, "Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions." And he told them this parable: "The ground of a certain rich man produced a good crop. He thought to himself, 'What shall I do? I have no place to store my crops.' "Then he said, 'This is what I'll do. I will tear down my barns and build bigger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. And I'll say to myself, "You have plenty of good things laid up for many years. Take life easy; eat, drink and be merry.” "But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?' "This is how it will be with anyone who stores up things for himself but is not rich toward God." (Luke 12:15-21) What does the world tell us? Acquire all the money you can. There is certainly nothing wrong with having a reserve for tough times, but we are constantly told to store up as much as we can. This doesn’t mean that you should spend everything you earn, but seek God’s guidance on how He wants to use what has been given to you. Don’t store up a lot of money and then sit back and take it easy. We don’t know what’s going to happen tomorrow, so stay close to the Lord, do not put your faith in money. "Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. So if you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you with true riches? And if you have not been trustworthy with someone else's property, who will give you property of your own? (Luke 16:10-12) We’re being told here that if you are faithful with a little, the Lord will give you more to manage for him…and not just wealth, but ‘true riches’. He will give you more authority to carry out His will. Most importantly, we are told that you cannot serve God and money. Don’t think that making lots of money and giving small amounts on Sunday means that you are serving God. If you are truly following the Lord, you are tithing on Sundays and giving when and where He asks you to give. Your focus is on Him. There are many lessons given to us in James chapter 4. One of them speaks directly to us today regarding how we are living our lives. We pursue worldly business and things with no thought about what the Lord wishes us to do. We don’t ask God for what we need, we try to do it all ourselves. “What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don't they come from your desires that battle within you? You want something but don't get it. You kill and covet, but you cannot have what you want. You quarrel and fight. You do not have, because you do not ask God. When you ask, you do not receive, because you ask with wrong motives, that you may spend what you get on your pleasures. You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God. Or do you think Scripture says without reason that the spirit he caused to live in us envies intensely? But he gives us more grace. That is why Scripture says: "God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble." Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Come near to God and he will come near to you. Wash your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded. Grieve, mourn and wail. Change your laughter to mourning and your joy to gloom. Humble yourselves before the Lord, and he will lift you up. Brothers, do not slander one another. Anyone who speaks against his brother or judges him speaks against the law and judges it. When you judge the law, you are not keeping it, but sitting in judgment on it. There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy. But you—who are you to judge your neighbor? Now listen, you who say, "Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money." Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes. Instead, you ought to say, "If it is the Lord's will, we will live and do this or that." As it is, you boast and brag. All such boasting is evil. Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn't do it, sins.” (James chapter 4) We must overcome the world and our focus on worldly things through faith in Jesus Christ: “You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world.” (1 John 4:4) “This is love for God: to obey his commands. And his commands are not burdensome, for everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world? Only he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.” (1 John 5:3-5) "I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world." (John 16:33) And finally, we are given warnings to those who are focused on wealth in this world and those that have taken advantage of the poor: “Now listen, you rich people, weep and wail because of the misery that is coming upon you. Your wealth has rotted, and moths have eaten your clothes. Your gold and silver are corroded. Their corrosion will testify against you and eat your flesh like fire. You have hoarded wealth in the last days. Look! The wages you failed to pay the workmen who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord Almighty. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter. You have condemned and murdered innocent men, who were not opposing you.” (James 5:1-6) As you think about these things, remember what we’re told from this passage in Luke. No matter what you have done to this point, it’s never too late to allow God to change your life and accept His offer of salvation - until you leave this world. Once we die in this world, there are no more chances. The Bible is clear on this subject. "There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man's table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores. "The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham's side. The rich man also died and was buried. In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.' "But Abraham replied, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.' "He answered, 'Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father's house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.' "Abraham replied, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.' " 'No, father Abraham,' he said, 'but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.' "He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.' " (Luke 16:19-31) I just read a couple of articles about why Americans are never satisfied with what we have. Even though we are the richest nation on earth, we want more. It’s always interesting to read secular articles try to explain these things when the Bible does a much better job in one sentence. In the fallen world in which we live, material gain is never good enough. “…..the eyes of man are never satisfied.” (Proverbs 27:20) In the end, we all need to remember why we’re here. We’re not here to live nice, comfortable lives and focus on gaining material wealth. We are here to love and serve our Creator in a spiritual war…just as He loves us. If our enemy has diverted you from your true purpose through worldly pursuits, it’s time to ask God for forgiveness and start on His path for your life. Remember, if you’re reading this, you still have time. Lastly, it doesn’t take a doctoral degree to see what most corporations focus on – the pursuit of money and power. There’s not a whole lot of difference between corporations and governments in the world today (both are in the business of power and money). In some areas, they actually seem to be blending together. Where is this pursuit of money leading us? The above verses spell it out quite clearly. In addition, the Bible tells us that we will not be able to buy or sell unless we accept the mark of the beast. While I don’t believe that the mark of the beast is technology related (previous post – this is a spiritual mark), I do believe that technology will certainly come into play. How else could the coming political beast prevent buying and selling? By removing cash from the world’s economic system. To buy and sell, you will need to be part of the ‘system’. Who will control the ‘system’? In the physical world, it will obviously be this beast. In the spiritual realm, satan will be in control of this. He will put enormous pressure on us to relent and give up – give up our life in eternity. Now think about this – who is inventing the technology to do this? Our government? No. Private enterprise – corporations. Also remember that as larger and larger mergers & acquisitions take place, more control is placed in the hands of fewer people. The same thing is happening as governments grow larger and exert more control over us. So, fewer and fewer people are controlling more and more of our money supply, economic policies, job opportunities, etc. Does this make you a little uneasy? It should. Bible prophecy tells us that power will be consolidated at the very end of this age. It’s happening right in front of us. Again, this isn’t an attack, it’s the truth. Corporations make decisions on what’s best for the company and pay no attention to whether it’s the correct, Biblical thing to do. In effect, they are not following God’s plan, but our enemy’s. If you are thinking that it is impossible to run a company according to Biblical principles in today’s world, then you believe our enemy’s lies – just as I did. This type of Godless decision-making will ultimately lead to technology that places the world into bondage. There will remain only one way to get free – Jesus Christ. If you are someone in a leadership position within a company, ask yourself who you are following. Which team are you on? Regardless of what you’ve been told, there are only two teams. Be honest with yourself. Don’t let our enemy tell you that your life should be used to make money and die rich. If you lead a Godless life in the pursuit of money and never ask for forgiveness – never receive God’s offer of salvation, there will be nothing that He can do for you at that point. You will have rejected all that He did to save you from an eternity in desolation. Worldly success is a deception - don’t be deceived. True success is walking in our Father’s perfect will. “Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain, but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment. Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, and to be generous and willing to share.” (1 Timothy 6:17-18)
If you regularly read the business section in your local newspaper or subscribe to the Wall Street Journal, then you have been reading over the past few years about the rise of ‘Private Equity’ and Hedge Funds. We’re going to spend some time discussing these funds in this post along with an article that was published today in the Wall Street Journal. If you are unfamiliar with these funds, you’ll gain a little insight into what they are and what they do. We’re not going to go into details, we’ll simply look at what they do and apply to them what the Bible says about wealth and the accumulation of wealth. If you are (or were) wealthy and invested in these funds, you are probably starting to feel a little uncomfortable - because you know where this is going……..
Hedge funds and private-equity funds are pools of private investor money. They typically boast of very high returns and therefore, attract large amounts of cash from very wealthy investors. There is a high degree of risk involved with these funds, but over recent years, the returns have been large enough to outweigh any perceived risk – and billions of dollars have flowed into them. Because of the promised high returns, they charge very high fees which are typically 2% of assets under management every year and 20% of any profits. So, they must be both aggressive and creative in order to make money for themselves and to keep their investors happy…..and from withdrawing their money. They have made billions of dollars in recent years for themselves and their investors. We’re going to take a brief look at how they have done this.
Have you ever been called by a hedge fund or private equity fund looking for new investment dollars? The answer for the vast majority of us is – no. The reason is that these funds cater to the rich. They are looking for multi-million dollar initial investments, not the few dollars you and I would put into a mutual fund every month. So, they are investment vehicles for the rich and are certainly influenced by very rich people. What does the Bible say about the rich and the pursuit of riches? We have already discussed this, so I will summarize here. The Bible tells us that we should seek the Lord and His Righteousness first – other things we need will be given to us. Do not love money, love the Lord. He will take care of us and give us all we need. What do you think the Lord sees when he looks at Wall Street and these funds? He sees wealthy people pursuing ever more wealth. Do these funds make money at the expense of the poor or less fortunate? Yes – they do. The pursuit of money has blinded us to how this money is made. This is what we’re going to focus on. Do you think the Lord approves of this type of behavior? We’ve already covered this topic in previous posts and the Bible is clear – the love of money is the root of all evil. It can’t get any clearer than this. So, if these funds and Wall Street in general are pursuing riches at all costs, how long do you think the Lord will allow it to continue? Will He allow the rich to continue to exploit the poor forever? I believe we’re about to find out that the answer is no. We are beginning to see this today – . Let’s take a quick look at events that have transpired over the past few months that are beginning to have a very direct impact on Wall Street.
We discussed the current subprime mortgage problem in a previous post. Let’s do a quick review of what has happened and what may happen in the future as a result of these events. Subprime mortgages are mortgages that are given to homebuyers with poor credit. These mortgages typically have much higher overall interest rates than mortgages given to consumers with good credit. It appears that many of them are not fixed rate loans, but have adjustable interest rates so that the mortgage broker or bank can offer very low initial interest rates that will reset at a much higher rate at a later date. It’s what many would call a ‘teaser’ rate that looks good to the borrower and sells more mortgages. As the Federal Reserve has increased the Federal Funds Rate, many of these mortgages have reset at much higher interest rates which have then increased the monthly payments that many of these subprime borrowers must pay every month. As a result, many of the subprime borrowers have been unable to make these increased payments leading to a very dramatic increase in home foreclosures.
You may be wondering how this has affected Wall Street and hedge funds. Good question. Until recently, a housing downturn could have affected Wall Street due to the overall impact to the economy, but now there is a much more direct correlation. In recent years these loans have been sold by the banks who initiated the loans to the big Wall Street investment banks. The Wall Street banks have then re-packaged these loans into investment securities called collateralized debt obligations or CDO’s. These CDO’s have then been bought by many different hedge funds. In recent years, these have been attractive to investors because they promised high returns and with the housing boom and low interest rates, the risk involved seemed muted. With the downturn in the housing market and increased interest rates, it has become apparent that many subprime borrowers were issued loans they could not afford. They can’t refinance because the value of their home has not appreciated (in some cases has depreciated) and interest rates are now higher than their initial rate….so they’re trapped. With no options, they lose their homes in foreclosure. We can talk about why this has happened, but the bottom line is that many have taken advantage of the poorest of us in the pursuit of wealth. I’m sure that the borrowers, brokers, banks and Wall Street have all played a part in this, but the bottom line is that many wealthy people were profiting from these loans. From what we read, there is very little concern about the people who have lost their homes as a result of this. The vast majority of articles we read are about how this could affect hedge funds, the housing market and the stock market. Ever wonder what the Bible says about loaning money to the poor at high interest rates? The answer is there and remember, the Lord’s Word applies to us today, just as it applied to everyone alive when it was written.
“He who increases his wealth by exorbitant interest amasses it for another, who will be kind to the poor.” (Proverbs 28:8)
The Lord is clear: if you continue to exploit the poor, your wealth will be taken from you.
“You trample on the poor
and force him to give you grain.
Therefore, though you have built stone mansions,
you will not live in them;
though you have planted lush vineyards,
you will not drink their wine.
For I know how many are your offenses
and how great your sins.
You oppress the righteous and take bribes
and you deprive the poor of justice in the courts.
Therefore the prudent man keeps quiet in such times,
for the times are evil.
Seek good, not evil,
that you may live.
Then the LORD God Almighty will be with you,
just as you say he is. “ (Amos 5:11-14)
“He oppresses the poor and needy.
He commits robbery.
He does not return what he took in pledge.
He looks to the idols.
He does detestable things.
He lends at usury and takes excessive interest. Will such a man live? He will not! Because he has done all these detestable things, he will surely be put to death and his blood will be on his own head.” (Ezekiel 18:12-13)
“The LORD takes his place in court;
he rises to judge the people.
The LORD enters into judgment
against the elders and leaders of his people:
"It is you who have ruined my vineyard;
the plunder from the poor is in your houses.
What do you mean by crushing my people
and grinding the faces of the poor?"
declares the Lord, the LORD Almighty.” (Isaiah 3:13-15)
There are many other verses, but we’ll stop there. Where is this subprime problem leading? Hedge funds that invested heavily in these subprime securities are closing. Debt markets are tightening due to investor’s adversity to the perceived increase in risk. This, in turn, is making it much harder for private equity companies to fund their buyout deals. This issue, coupled with the housing downturn, is causing the stock market to fall (the NYSE dropped over 300 points yesterday). It shouldn’t surprise anyone who is spiritually mature that the exploitation of the poor by the wealthy is turning around to bite the wealthy. Will the current situation end softly or are we facing something much more dramatic? I believe we are seeing the beginning of the end of the financial dominance of the United States. What we are seeing is only the beginning as the Lord begins to redistribute wealth from those focused on themselves and the pursuit of money to those who are following Him and His kingdom.
The following article appeared in the Wall Street Journal today. Take note of who is benefiting from the efforts of private equity and who is suffering.
IN THE TRENCHES
How a Blackstone Deal
Shook Up a Work Force
Layoffs at Travelport,
Dividend for Investors;
'On Pins and Needles'
By IANTHE JEANNE DUGAN
; Page A1
CENTENNIAL, Colo. -- Not long after the Blackstone Group bought Travelport Ltd. last August, workers at the company's office campus here began feeling the squeeze.
Two months after the deal closed, scores of employees were lugging boxes of personal belongings to their cars, having lost their jobs. Under Blackstone's ownership, the travel-reservations conglomerate has laid off 841 people, about 10% of its work force. Blackstone, a private-equity firm, has already recouped all of the money it invested in Travelport.
__________________________________
RAPID PACE
• The Situation: After Blackstone Group bought Travelport, changes came swiftly for some workers.
• The Background: To capitalize on their investments more quickly, private-equity firms have been overhauling companies faster.
• The Bottom Line: Travelport has laid off 841 workers, and Blackstone has already recouped its investment.
_______________________________
Similar scenes have been unfolding at companies around the nation, a human toll of the corporate-buyout boom. Private-equity firms, which say they bring sorely needed financial discipline to poorly run companies, have been slashing costs and extracting profits at warp speed. As the cycle of buying and selling companies has intensified, life in the trenches can be unstable and traumatic.
By the end of 2007, Travelport expects to slash costs by $150 million. Last week, it brought public its online reservations unit, Orbitz Worldwide Inc., using the proceeds to pay off debt. Its Galileo unit, which feeds airline information to travel agents, is the focus of much of the overhaul. Many of the job cuts have occurred at the company's data-operations center here outside , where some jobs have been outmoded by shifts in technology and in the way people buy airline tickets and rent cars, executives say.
John Kliegel, 41 years old, a computer-systems analyst, and his twin, Russell, a technical writer, were both laid off. They're selling the house they share because they can no longer afford it. Don Kleppinger, a 46-year-old software engineer with five sons, lost his job, leaving him without health insurance for several months. Grace Covyeau, 63, who lost her job as a telecommunications engineer, took a part-time job last month making sandwiches and coffee at King Soopers grocery store.
"It came as a shock," says Michael Berson, 49, who lost his job as a data engineer in October, three years after receiving a "Super Star" award for saving the company $1.2 million on telecommunications costs. Mr. Berson has moved to , where he is looking for a new job.
In addition to the 841 layoffs, 1,500 Travelport workers have left voluntarily since the buyout. The company says it has hired 1,582 new workers during that period, and has invested heavily in new technology.
Travelport Chief Executive Jeff Clarke describes the Centennial operation as the "factory" through which thousands of transactions pass every second. "We need to shift into new technologies," he says. "Some require productivity improvements and often will lead to layoffs."
To complete their $4.3 billion Travelport purchase, Blackstone and Technology Crossover Ventures, a , venture-capital firm that now owns 11%, invested $1 billion and borrowed the rest. That debt landed on Travelport's balance sheet. In March, Travelport borrowed an additional $1.1 billion and paid it out as a dividend to the two firms, returning all their money in just seven months.
"This is likely one of the quickest returns of invested capital for a private-equity deal of its size," Travelport's new chief financial officer, Michael Rescoe, said in a May conference call with analysts.
The buyout boom has been lucrative for Blackstone partners and investors, which include large institutions such as pension funds. Last year, Blackstone managed assets valued at about $88 billion and earned $2.27 billion, according to a prospectus for its own initial public offering in June. Its chief executive, Stephen Schwarzman, who resides in a 35-room apartment, made more than $650 million on the offering and retained a 24% stake now worth more than $5 billion.
Such riches raise hackles among laid-off workers. "These investments are helping the fat cats by hurting the little guys," says Ms. Covyeau. "It'll make you sick."
Over the past five years, private-equity firms have bought more than 10,000 companies. This year, through June, 1,399 deals worth $582 billion have been announced, according to data provider Dealogic.
In order to recoup their investments quickly, buyout firms are speeding up everything -- closing deals more swiftly, cutting jobs and restructuring companies faster, and taking them public sooner. They've also been taking big cash payments out of the companies they buy, as Blackstone did with Travelport. These payments, known as "dividend recapitalizations," reached a record $25 billion in 2006, and are on pace to exceed that amount this year, according to Standard & Poor's Corp. In 2001, they amounted to just $1 billion. The payments increase pressure to cut costs.
"Layoffs are far more likely at firms that pay these dividends," says Steven Bavaria, who oversees bank-loan ratings at Standard & Poor's. "Employees left behind are doing more work, looking over their shoulders, feeling stressed."
At a congressional hearing in May, the Private Equity Council, a lobbying group, testified that buyouts often result in long-term job growth. It cited the Carlyle Group's 2005 purchase of auto-parts company AxleTech International Holdings Inc., which grew to 568 from 425 workers after it began supplying parts to military-vehicle makers.
In other cases, job cuts follow buyouts. After buying Hertz Global Holdings Inc. for $15 billion from Ford Motor Co. in late 2005, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Inc. and a unit of Merrill Lynch & Co. collected a $1 billion dividend, then took the company public. This year, Hertz cut more than 2,000 jobs, or about 8% of its work force.
Last summer, Blackstone teamed up with Carlyle, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and other buyout firms to buy VNU, the parent of Nielsen Media Research and ACNielsen, for about $10 billion. In December, the firm announced 4,100 job cuts, about 10% of its work force.
"None of us wants a single job to be cut," says Paul "Chip" Schorr IV, the Blackstone senior managing director who orchestrated the purchase of Travelport and now serves as its chairman. Mr. Schorr, 40, joined Blackstone in 2005 from the venture-capital arm of Citigroup Inc.
The layoffs at Travelport were one of many steps taken to revamp the company. All told, Travelport has reduced operating costs by 6%, the company says.
Before Blackstone bought it, Travelport was operating as the Travel Distribution Systems unit of Cendant Corp., a travel and real-estate conglomerate based in Cendant's founder and chief executive, Henry Silverman, a former Blackstone partner, had cobbled together Cendant's travel unit through a series of acquisitions.
Galileo, which Cendant bought in 2001, gets paid by airlines to feed information about airline schedules, pricing and inventory to travel agents. In addition, it runs the reservations system for United Airlines. Galileo is the largest contributor of Travelport revenue, which totaled $2.6 billion last year.
That business has been suffering. The Sept. 11 attacks curtailed airline travel, as did the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS. In 2003, struggling airlines reduced the fees they paid to middlemen such as Galileo.
Cendant also had gotten into the online travel-agency business by buying Orbitz, which competes with Travelocity, Expedia and others. Each time consumers use the site to book reservations for flights, rental cars and hotels, Orbitz collects a fee. As more consumers turned to the Internet for travel planning, the business grew.
But as airlines and hotels began handling reservations through their own Web sites, the middlemen lost business. In 2001, systems such as Galileo had handled 70% of airline reservations, according to Forrester Research, a market-research firm. These days, such systems handle just 50%. Cendant began laying off employees, and in 2005, it decided to split itself into four parts.
Mr. Schorr believed that Cendant hadn't fully integrated the systems behind the travel businesses it had acquired. "It was like having a house with eight kitchens," he says. If it eliminated overlapping systems, he believed, the business could become more efficient. He also saw growing opportunities in foreign markets such as the and .
On Aug. 23, the day Blackstone took over, Mr. Clarke wrote to employees on an internal blog: "For most of us, our jobs won't change." Mr. Clarke, who had become chief executive a few months earlier, previously held senior positions at Computer Associates and at Compaq Computer Corp.
Some employees believed Blackstone's arrival would ease the belt-tightening and stress that had begun under Cendant. "A lot of us thought these layoffs would stop," says Gina Fugazzi, 51, who oversaw the company's voice systems in the "There was no more to cut."
Others had heard enough about how private-equity firms operate to be concerned about their jobs. Ms. Covyeau, the telecommunications manager, says many employees were "aware that the pattern at private-equity firms was streamlining work forces." Anxiety, she says, began rising.
In the blog, Mr. Clarke noted to employees that Travelport intended to re-engineer operations to reduce overlap and to eliminate "activities that are not contributing to our success."
The company decided to overhaul the telecommunications center housed in Centennial. "We are automating work that was done manually," explains Mr. Clarke.
Within weeks of the buyout, at a meeting with employees in Centennial, some managers warned that more cuts were coming. Ms. Covyeau says she began packing her boxes and told a manager: "Please, just give me a severance package and let me out of here."
One morning in October, managers in Centennial sent emails instructing employees to report to various conference rooms and cafeterias. Ms. Fugazzi says her heart sank when she walked into her designated room and found only about 20 people. "I suddenly realized I was in a group getting laid off," she says. A colleague, she recalls, spotted a tray of bagels and coffee and chortled: "Looks like this is our last supper."
A manager told them their jobs were being cut for economic reasons, according to several people who were there. Some employees burst into tears; others stared stoically. "I was devastated," recalls Ms. Fugazzi, who says she had planned to retire in four years. "I had the mentality that if you worked hard, you could keep your job forever."
When they got back to their desks, their email had been disabled. Guards lingered while employees filled boxes with belongings. The company declined to provide written references. In the confusion, some employees say, they were inadvertently given a wrong number to call about benefits -- it was a sex line. A company spokesman says only eight employees received the incorrect number, and the company corrected the mistake right away.
All told, Travelport laid off about 500 people that month, including veterans in their 50s and 60s who say they had good performance reviews and relatively high salaries of about $100,000.
Most of the layoffs occurred at Galileo. Gordon Wilson, Galileo's London-based chief executive, said in a written statement that many of the jobs had been outmoded by technology. For example, travel agents used to connect to Galileo's system by phone. Now, many of them access it via the Internet.
The company offered laid-off employees two weeks severance for every year they worked, according to several employees. Mr. Wilson declined to provide details about the severance packages, which he called "generous."
In December, Travelport announced the acquisition of Worldspan, one of Galileo's chief competitors, for $1.4 billion. At a Christmas party at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, a Travelport executive assured remaining employees that 2007 would be more stable, according to people who were there.
In January, Mr. Clarke, the chief executive, reorganized Travelport into three brands -- Orbitz, Galileo and Gullivers Travel Associates, a wholesaler of hotel rooms and group tours. The company continued to cut jobs.
Galileo's Mr. Wilson says he has warned employees of "further changes" as the company completes the Worldspan acquisition. The deal could produce about $100 million in cost savings through the consolidation of sales staffs, data centers, and other operations, Mr. Clarke says.
In this year's first quarter, Travelport's profits were up 36% over the year-earlier period, to $157 million. Half of the profit improvement was because of revenue growth, the company says, 25% was because of vendor-related cost reductions and 25% was from productivity improvements, including reductions in the work force.
Mr. Wilson says Travelport's debt load has made it more urgent to generate cash. "If we can accelerate the reduction of our debt and therefore lessen our interest payments," he says, "no one would expect management to do otherwise."
With the Worldspan merger looming, employees at both companies say they are worried about their jobs. "We are all on pins and needles," says one employee. "Everybody here feels it's only a matter of time."
For many laid-off employees, finding new jobs hasn't been easy. Danny Carrasco, a software developer in his 50s, searched for five months before finding a job at a telecommunications company. Technical analyst Robert Renwick, 30, sent out more than 100 résumés over four months before landing a job at the local school district. He and his wife, a first-grade teacher, put off having children, he says. "I can't believe they would ruin all these lives to make a couple extra pennies," he says.
John Kliegel is earning 33% less as a program manager at a satellite company. His twin, Russell, is juggling job hunting with free-lancing. Mr. Kleppinger, the software engineer, once expected to retire at Travelport. He's now earning 20% less at a new job.
After months of searching, writing résumés and reading books on how to interview, Ms. Fugazzi landed a job with the Colorado Department of Human Services. She earns about $33,000 less than she did at Travelport, counting her old bonus. But the government job, she says, "feels more secure."
Write to Ianthe Jeanne Dugan at ianthe.dugan@wsj.com
The following article was printed today in the Wall Street Journal (August 7, 2007). It does an excellent job of describing what has happened to credit markets over the past decade as a result of decisions made by the Federal Reserve and Wall Street investment banks.
ASSETS: Gold certificate account 11,037 Special drawing rights certificate acct. 2,200 Coin 932 Securities, repos and loans 812,372 Securities held outright 790,439 U.S. Treasury 790,439 Bills 277,019 Notes and bonds 513,420 Repurchase agreements 21,000 Loans 933 Items in process of collection 4,524 Bank premises 2,036 Other assets 37,767 Total Assets 870,868 Analyzing the Federal Reserve's Balance Sheet reveals many interesting things: "Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."(Paul Warburg, drafter of the Federal Reserve Act) "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws."(Mayer Amschel Rothschild) By GREG IP and JON E. HILSENRATH An extraordinary credit boom that created many first-time homeowners and financed a wave of corporate takeovers seems to be waning. Home buyers with poor credit are having trouble borrowing. Institutional investors from Milwaukee to Düsseldorf to Sydney are reporting losses. Banks are stuck with corporate debt that investors won't buy. Stocks are on a roller coaster, with financial powerhouses like Bear Stearns Cos. and Blackstone Group coming under intense pressure. The origins of the boom and this unfolding reversal predate last year's mistakes. They trace to changes in the banking system provoked by the collapse of the savings-and-loan industry in the 1980s, the reaction of governments to the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s, and the Federal Reserve's response to the 2000-01 bursting of the tech-stock bubble. When the Fed cut interest rates to the lowest level in a generation to avoid a severe downturn, then-Chairman Alan Greenspan anticipated that making short-term credit so cheap would have unintended consequences. "I don't know what it is, but we're doing some damage because this is not the way credit markets should operate," he and a colleague recall him saying at the time. Now the consequences of moves the Fed and others made are becoming clearer.
Fourth in a series • Page One: Mortgage Mess Shines Light on Brokers' Role • Page One: How Wall Street Stoked The Mortgage Meltdown Low interest rates engineered by central banks and reinforced by a tidal wave of overseas savings fueled home prices and leveraged buyouts. Pension funds and endowments, unhappy with skimpy returns, shoved cash at hedge funds and private-equity firms, which borrowed heavily to make big bets. The investments of choice were opaque financial instruments that shifted default risk from lenders to global investors. The question now: When the dust settles, will the world be better off? "These adverse periods are very painful, but they're inevitable if we choose to maintain a system in which people are free to take risks, a necessary condition for maximum sustainable economic growth," Mr. Greenspan says today. The evolving financial architecture is distributing risks away from highly leveraged banks toward investors better able to handle them, keeping the banks and economy more stable than in the past, he says. Economic growth, particularly outside the U.S., is strong, and even in the U.S., unemployment remains low. The financial system has absorbed the latest shock. So far. But credit problems once seen as isolated to a few subprime-mortgage lenders are beginning to propagate across markets and borders in unpredicted ways and degrees. A system designed to distribute and absorb risk might, instead, have bred it, by making it so easy for investors to buy complex securities they didn't fully understand. And the interconnectedness of markets could mean that a sudden change in sentiment by investors in all sorts of markets could destabilize the financial system and hurt economic growth. Side Effects of Deflation Fight When a technology stock and investment plunge and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks pushed the economy into recession in 2001, the Fed slashed interest rates. But even by mid-2003, job creation and business investment were still anemic, and the inflation rate was slipping toward 1%. The Fed began to study Japan's unhappy bout with deflation -- generally declining prices -- which made it harder to repay debts and left the central bank seemingly powerless to stimulate growth. "Even though we perceive the risks [of deflation] as minor, the potential consequences are very substantial and could be quite negative," Mr. Greenspan said in May 2003. A month later, the Fed cut the target for its key federal-funds interest rate, a benchmark for all short-term rates, to 1%. It said the rate would stay there as long as necessary, figuring low rates would bolster housing and consumer spending until business investment and exports recovered. The rate stayed at 1% for a year. Mr. Greenspan raised vague fears with colleagues over the possibility this policy could create distortions in the economy, but he says today that such risks were an acceptable price for insuring against deflation. "Central banks cannot avoid taking risks. Such trade-offs are an integral part of policy. We were always confronted with choices." Fed officials who were there at the time generally maintain their policy was right, even in hindsight. The economy has grown steadily, avoiding both deflation and serious inflation. Yet some say they may have planted seeds of excess in the housing and subprime-loan markets. Robert Eisenbeis, retired research director at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, says the Fed overreacted to the threat of deflation and kept rates low for too long. As a result, it "overstimulated the housing market, and now we're dealing with the consequences." Edward Gramlich, a Fed governor in Washington from 1997 to 2005, says he failed to realize at the time that low rates were making it so easy for lenders to market subprime mortgages with low introductory rates. The Fed and other regulators could have prevented some of the resulting pain with more rigorous supervision of mortgage lenders besides banks, he says. "We didn't have that, and we're paying for it now." In June 2004, the Fed began to raise the short-term target rate, eventually taking it to 5.25%, where it has been for the past year. Such a boost usually leads to a rise, as well, in long-term rates, which are important to rates on 30-year conventional mortgages and corporate bonds. This time, it didn't. Mr. Greenspan expressed concern that investors were willing to accept low returns for taking on risk. "What they perceive as newly abundant liquidity can readily disappear," he said in August 2005, six months before retiring. "History has not dealt kindly with the aftermath of protracted periods of low risk premiums." Looking back, he says today: "We tried in 2004 to move long-term rates higher in order to get mortgage interest rates up and take some of the fizz out of the housing market. But we failed." Something besides Fed policy was at work. Both Mr. Greenspan and his successor, Ben Bernanke, point to an unanticipated surge in capital pouring into the U.S. from overseas. 'Global Saving Glut' In June 1998, U.S. Treasury officials made a plea to China that they would be reminded of repeatedly in the following years. Thailand had devalued its currency in 1997, touching off a crisis in the region that led other countries to devalue and in some cases default on foreign debt. The yen was sliding. Chinese officials, who pegged their currency to the U.S. dollar, "let it be known...that if things kept going this way they'd have no choice but to devalue," recalls Ted Truman, a Treasury official at the time. The U.S., fearing such a move would trigger another round of devaluations, urged the Chinese to hold their peg, and praised them when they did so. The Journal's Jon Hilsenrath discusses the origins of the credit boom and some of the lessons to be learned from its demise. But times changed. As recessions and depressed currencies held down imports and goosed exports in other Asian countries, the countries ran trade surpluses that replenished foreign-exchange reserves. Determined never to be so tied to the onerous conditions of the International Monetary Fund, they have kept those policies in place. Thai reserves, effectively exhausted in 1997, now stand at $73 billion. Long after the crisis passed, China's economic fundamentals suggested its currency should rise against the dollar. China let it rise only slowly, continuing to juice exports and produce trade surpluses that pushed China's foreign-exchange reserves above $1 trillion. When the U.S. pressed China to let its currency float, China reminded the U.S. of the fixed exchange rate's stabilizing role in 1998. China put much of its cash -- part of what Mr. Bernanke has called a "global saving glut" -- into U.S. Treasurys, helping hold down long-term U.S. interest rates. Chinese government entities also recently poured $3 billion into U.S. private-equity firm Blackstone. Mortgages for All Lou Barnes, co-owner of a small Colorado mortgage bank called Boulder West Inc., has been in the mortgage business since the late 1970s. For most of that time, a borrower had to fully document his income. Lenders offered the first no-documentation loans in the mid-1990s, but for no more than 70% of the value of the house being purchased. A few years back, he says, that began to change as Wall Street investment banks and wholesalers demanded ever more mortgages from even the least creditworthy -- or "subprime" -- customers. "All of us felt the suction from Wall Street. One day you would get an email saying, 'We will buy no-doc loans at 95% loan-to-value,' and an old-timer like me had never seen one," says Mr. Barnes. "It wasn't long before the no-doc emails said 100%." Until the late 1990s, the subprime market was dominated by home-equity lines used by borrowers to consolidate debt and by loans on mobile homes. But when the Fed held rates down after 2001, lenders could offer borrowers with sketchy credit histories adjustable-rate mortgages with introductory rates that seemed affordable. Mr. Barnes says customers were asking about "2/28" subprime loans. These offered a low starter rate for two years, then adjusted for the remaining 28 to a rate that was often three percentage points higher than a prime customer normally paid. Customers, he says, seldom appreciated how high that rate could be once the Fed returned rates to normal levels. Demand from consumers, on one side, and Wall Street and its customers on the other side prompted lenders to make more and more subprime loans. Originations rose to $600 billion or more in both 2005 and 2006 from $160 billion in 2001, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, an industry publication. At first, delinquencies were surprisingly low. As a result, the credit ratings for bonds backed by the mortgages assumed a modest default rate. Standards for getting a mortgage fell. About 45% of all subprime loans in 2006 went to borrowers who didn't fully document their income, making it easier for them to overstate their creditworthiness. The delinquency rate was a mirage: It was low mainly because home prices were rising so much that borrowers who fell behind could easily refinance. When home prices stopped rising in 2006, and fell in some regions, that game ended. Borrowers with subprime loans made in 2006 fell behind on monthly payments much more quickly than mortgages made a year or two earlier. When banks get in trouble, federal deposit insurance encourages depositors not to flee, and in extreme circumstances, banks can borrow directly from the Fed. But banks are no longer the dominant lenders. After the S&L crisis in the 1980s and early 1990s, regulators insisted banks and thrifts hold more capital against risky loans. This tipped the playing field in favor of unregulated lenders. They financed themselves not by deposits but by Wall Street credit lines and by "securitization" of their loans -- in effect, the sale of the loans to investors. The consequences proved painful. New Century Financial Corp., founded in 1995 by three former S&L executives, was the nation's second largest subprime lender by 2006. When its borrowers began falling behind, Wall Street cut off its lines of credit and forced it to buy back some of its poorly performing loans. New Century couldn't fall back on deposit insurance or the Fed. It filed for bankruptcy protection in April, wiping out shareholders and triggering market-wide fears about the health of the subprime business. LBO Boom Home buyers were not alone. In August 2002, Qwest Communications International Inc. -- heavily indebted, beaten down by the telecom bust and under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission -- decided to sell its Yellow Pages business. Private-equity firms Carlyle Group and Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe agreed to buy it for $7 billion, about $5.5 billion of it borrowed. The business produced steady cash flow that could be used to pay down the debt. The buyers were worried they might not be able to borrow as much as they needed. "We were coming out of a pretty bad credit cycle," says Daniel Toscano, managing director at Deutsche Bank, which helped to manage the fund-raising. Instead, they tapped into a gusher. Within a year, Dex Media Inc., as the business became known, was back in the market. It borrowed $889 million to pay a dividend to Carlyle and Welsh Carson, and then $250 million more to pay another dividend. In just 15 months, the private-equity buyers made back most of their investment and still owned the company. By 2006, the volume of such leveraged buyouts was smashing records from the 1980s. Generous credit markets enabled private-equity firms to do larger deals and pay themselves bigger dividends. They boosted returns -- and attracted more investors, which enabled even bigger deals. As in subprime mortgages, lenders began to ease borrowing requirements. They agreed, for instance, to "covenant-lite debt," which dropped once-standard performance requirements, and "PIK-toggle" notes, which allowed borrowers to toggle interest payments on and off like a faucet. Bankers began marketing debt deals for companies that, unlike Yellow Pages, didn't have comfortable cash flow. There was Chrysler, burning cash rather than producing it. And there was First Data Corp., whose post-takeover cash flow would barely cover interest payments and capital spending, according to Standard & Poor's LCD, a unit of S&P which tracks the high-yield market. Last month, investors began to balk. Now many banks find themselves having committed to lend about $200 billion that they had intended to turn over to investors, but can't. Let's All Look Like Yale The subprime and LBO booms required willing lenders. The stock-market collapse and low interest rates of 2001 to 2004 nurtured a class of investors and products to fill that role. Managers of pension and endowment funds long had divided their assets among domestic stocks, bonds and cash. The funds saw their performance suffer when the stock market and then bond yields tumbled. A few endowments, most notably at Yale and Harvard, had for years been spreading their investments more broadly, going into hedge funds, real estate, foreign stocks, even timberland. The goal was holdings that wouldn't suffer in sync with stocks in a bear market. Sure enough, in 2000 and 2001, even as stocks tumbled, Harvard Management Co. earned returns of 32.2% and -2.7% respectively. Yale's returns were 41% and 9.2%. Other institutions wanted their money managed the same way, seeding a flood of hedge funds that bought other untraditional investments such as credit derivatives. University endowments poured roughly $40 billion into hedge funds between 2000 and 2006, according to Hedge Fund Intelligence, a newsletter. "I call it the 'Let's all look like Yale effect,'" says Jeremy Grantham, chairman of Boston money manager GMO LLC. Low interest rates made many investors willing to buy exotic securities in an effort to boost returns. Wall Street had just the vehicle: securitization, or turning loans that once sat quietly on banks' books into securities that can be sold in global markets. Securitization, long common in conventional mortgages, had been supercharged in the early 1990s when the federal Resolution Trust Corp. took over S&Ls that held more than $400 billion of assets. Though some thought it would take the RTC a century to unload them, it took only a few years. The agency successfully securitized new classes of assets, such as delinquent home loans or commercial loans. In the late 1990s, Wall Street went a step further, packaging bigger pools of securities into collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, and carving them into "tranches," each with a different level of risk and return. Riskier tranches suffered the first losses if some underlying loans defaulted. Other tranches offered lower returns because riskier tranches would take the first hits if the business went sour. Because of the way they were structured, some CDO tranches got triple-A ratings from Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's even though they contained subprime loans. That lured traditionally conservative investors such as commercial banks, insurance companies and pension funds. The upside was evident: Many borrowers got loans they wouldn't otherwise have had. The taxpayer-backed deposit fund was less likely to bear the cost of sloppy lending practices. Banks shifted risks to investors more willing to bear them -- leaving the banks able to make more loans. Investors could pick either more-risky or less-risky slices. And Wall Street middlemen made handsome profits. Now the downside, too, is painfully evident. Final investors were so many steps removed from the original loans that it became hard for them to know the true value and risk of securities they bought. Some were satisfied with a triple-A rating on a CDO -- seemingly as safe as a U.S. Treasury bond but with more yield. Yet as defaults ate through the cushion of lower-rated tranches with unexpected speed, rating agencies were forced to rethink their models -- and lower the ratings on many of these investments. Some structures were so opaque that markets couldn't value them. But ratings cuts sometimes forced an acknowledgment that securities owned weren't worth as much as thought. In May, Swiss bank UBS AG shut down a hedge fund after a $124 million loss. In June, two Bear Stearns hedge funds saw as much as $1.6 billion of investor capital wiped out by bad mortgage bets and pulled credit lines. The trouble spread to hedge funds in Sydney, Australia, a mortgage insurer in Milwaukee and a bank in Düsseldorf, Germany. Even Harvard has been hit. The university lost about $350 million through an investment in Sowood Capital Management, a hedge-fund firm founded by one of the university's former in-house money managers. Casino Night Recent events show that financial innovations meant to distribute risk can end up multiplying it instead, in ways neither regulators nor investors fully understand. Mr. Grantham, the Boston money manager, says his portfolios are behaving in ways he hadn't expected. Fed officials believe that even if their policies led to housing and debt bubbles, the strength of the overall economy shows that the policy was, on balance, the right one. Of course, that assumes the current problems don't culminate in a recession. Market veterans predict the most egregious underwriting practices and products will disappear, but the benefits of innovation will continue. Lessons have been learned -- the hard way. "The structures are here to stay," says Glenn Reynolds, chief executive of research firm CreditSights. "But you have to run it like a prudent risk-taking venture, not like it's casino night and you're on a bender." Write to Greg Ip at greg.ip@wsj.com and Jon E. Hilsenrath at jon.hilsenrath@wsj.com Wall St. Journal
It's obvious what is driving Wall Street - greed. Why else would you push mortgage companies for loans (that could be repackaged as securities) with no income documentation from the borrower that covered 100% of the purchase price? There has been no regard for the people who borrowed this money. No consideration of what would happen when these 'introductory' rates reset at higher interest rates. The only consideration was - how much money can I make? I'm sure that there were people within Wall Street who probably sounded an alarm - but it's obvious that any objections were silenced by the people at the top. What is the root of all evil?
We are led to believe that no one truly understands how our economy works (from the world's perspective) - it's simply too complicated. If you only listen to the media and economic ‘experts’ and never study economic and monetary policy yourself, you’ll never understand the truth of the economic system you rely on. I now believe that there are a few men in the world today who do understand and control much of the world’s economic activity. Because this certainly relates to Biblical end time events – we’ll review the truth of our monetary system in the next post.
We have many ways to measure our economy and economic growth, but what really causes periods of growth and periods of recession? What triggers a recession or a depression? If the leaders of our nation really understood our economy and really cared about our livelihood, we'd obviously never have recessions or depressions. Over the past few years, I've read many who believed we finally had it all figured out. Now, uncertainty reigns again. Derivatives, CLO's, CDO's & SIV’s supposedly spread risk around and protect investors....now it appears that everything is much more closely interconnected than anyone thought. Based on what we've learned about wealth from the Bible, do you really want to align yourself with such greed by investing in Wall Street? Take note of the section below entitled 'Casino Night'. Do you really want to place your life savings on black and have someone spin the wheel? At least in Vegas, you know your odds.
The actions of the Federal Reserve are more curious. Let's disregard for a moment that the Federal Reserve is a private corporation with private owners and take a quick look at their actions over the past few years. After Sept 11, 2001, the Fed reduced the Federal Funds Rate (rate charged to banks) to 1%. This is what has contributed to the 'easy money' or liquidity flowing throughout the world (see article below for details). As the economy has strengthened in recent years, the Federal Funds rate has steadily climbed to 5.25%. This, in effect, has raised the cost of everything in this country. The reason we are consistently given for this increase is that the Fed is concerned about inflation. We are always told that inflation is the enemy and must be contained at all costs. I agree, from an economic standpoint, inflation can destroy economic growth. But the question we must ask is this - is the Fed truly concerned about inflation?
Economists measure inflation in a couple of ways - the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Producer Price indexes (PPI) are two of the most prominent measures of inflation. Both measure the change in prices (for consumers and businesses) over time. What is something else that impacts the rate of inflation that doesn't get mentioned much in the media? The money supply. It stands to reason that as the supply of money in a nation increases, the chance of inflation increases. If you place more money in the hands of consumers and businesses, then there is a very high probability that everyone will buy more and invest more and drive up the prices of everything from consumer goods and services to stocks. Not sure whether this is an acceptable way to measure inflation? It used to be a very accurate measure of inflation – by the Federal Reserve. The following was taken from Wikipedia:
“In January 1987, with C.P.I. inflation down to only 1%, the Federal Reserve announced it was no longer going to use money supply aggregates, such as M2, as guidelines to control inflation, even though this method had been in use from 1979, apparently with great success. Previous to 1980, interest rates were used as guidelines; inflation was heavy. The Fed complained that the aggregates were confusing; Volcker was still chairman until August 1987, whereupon Alan Greenspan assumed the mantle, seven months after monetary aggregate policy had changed.”
Think about home equity loans. Low interest rates coupled with a hot housing market (again, this is inflation) has enabled many people to cash out equity in their homes. What have they done with this money? From what I've read, many have bought more stuff. This increases prices (supply and demand comes into play) and therefore, the rate of inflation increases.
So, does the Federal Reserve measure the overall money supply in the U.S.? It did until March 23, 2006. On this date, the Fed stopped publishing data on the M3 money supply (total measurement of our money supply). The following information was taken from Wikipedia:
"The most common measures are named M0 (narrowest), M1, M2, and M3. In the United States they are defined by the Federal Reserve as follows:
M0: The total of all physical currency, plus accounts at the central bank that can be exchanged for physical currency.
M1: M0 - those portions of M0 held as reserves or vault cash + the amount in demand accounts ("checking" or "current" accounts).
M2: M1 + most savings accounts, money market accounts, small denomination time deposits and certificate of deposit accounts (CDs) of under $100,000.
M3: M2 + all other CDs, deposits of eurodollars and repurchase agreements.
As of March 23, 2006, information regarding M3 will no longer be published by the Federal Reserve, ostensibly because it costs a lot to collect the data but doesn't provide significantly useful data[1]. The other three money supply measures will continue to be provided in detail.
In an effort to reverse this change, Congressman Ron Paul introduced the now expired H.R.4892[2] on March 7th, 2006, and subsequently sponsored H.R.2754[3][4] on June 15th, 2007 which has been referred to the House Committee on Financial Services."
The Fed has said that M3 data is not significant. Really? Apparently, it was important from 1979 to 1987 when they used the money supply to measure inflation very effectively. Why is it now not important? By not publishing this data, we don't know how many dollars are in circulation throughout the world (coins, bills, checking accounts, foreign accounts, etc). Theoretically, you could estimate M3 from the other measures, but it would take alot of time and would only be an approximation. How much money are we talking about? At the time the Fed stopped publishing M3 data (March 2006), the total amount of our money supply equaled 10 trillion dollars. M3 data represented 3 trillion additional dollars in addition to M2. Not reporting 30% of our money supply is not significant? It is also interesting to note that the total value of our money supply has increased to 10 trillion dollars in 2006 from 4 trillion in 1990. So, our total 'supply' of dollars has more than doubled in only 16 years. Should it surprise us that the dollar is weakening against other currencies throughout the world? If the Fed was really concerned about inflation, why have they flooded the world's markets with dollars and stopped publishing this data?
The final question we need to ask is this - is the Federal Reserve acting in our best interests (the nation) or is it acting in the interests of its owners? Do private companies act in the best interests of everyone or do they act in the best interests of their shareholders? What if the shareholders of the Fed have another motive for their actions? Remember, we are not talking about Godly people. If you are still not convinced that the Federal Reserve system is privately controlled, the following was taken from Wikipedia:
“In Lewis v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stated that "the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA [the Federal Tort Claims Act], but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations."”
Let’s take a look at the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. This information is taken from Wikipedia. The dollar amounts are in millions.
So, the Federal Reserve has over $870 Billion dollars in assets.
The following analysis is also taken from Wikipedia. The figure that stands out to me is the amount of money the Federal Government (that’s you and me included) owes the Federal Reserve banking system. At the time this article was written (June 2007), the United States Government owes the Federal Reserve $790 Billion dollars. This represents 9% of our national debt. That’s the price we pay to the Fed to create our currency and manage the banking system. When the media discusses our national debt, why is this never mentioned? People in high places would prefer that we didn’t know.
The question becomes – should the United States Government pay a private corporation to manage its money? I believe what we have all forgotten is that our money has no real value. Since 1971, our money is no longer, in any way, tied to the value of gold. So, our paper money is only good to use as long as everyone accepts it as money. If the dollar crashes on world markets, what will happen to our banking system? It won’t be good.
Starting to feel uncomfortable?
What if the private owners of the Federal Reserve are the same people who control much of our government behind the scenes? If you study all of the events of 9/11/2001, you will find that there were many suspicious financial transactions taking place before the event. Many 'puts' (bets that a stock will fall) were placed on airline stocks (including Boeing). The number of puts placed before the attacks were many times higher than the norm. Harddrives were recovered from ground zero that showed many millions of dollars in financial transactions related to the event that someone apparently thought would be 'covered up' and destroyed. Where are the billions of dollars worth of gold that was stored in the vaults of the World Trade Center? It seems to have vanished. Why doesn't our mainstream media investigate these things? Whether you want to believe it or not, many people had prior knowledge of this event. It's hard to believe, but it's the truth.
So, what if this event was planned as a 'false flag' operation that would be used against us in order to slowly remove our freedoms in the name of the 'war on terror'? Whether you want to believe it, this is exactly what is happening (Patriot and Military Commissions Act, the various 'executive orders' from President Bush). Don't forget, we are dealing with very intelligent, deceptive people who place no value on your life or mine - they use our patriotism against us. What if, in connection with this event, the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates for a long time to give the appearance that they were helping us, but were, in effect, setting up the world for a major financial crisis? Is it a coincidence that at a time we are worrying about a future terrorist event, financial markets are experiencing a very high level of volatility? It's as if we have been directed to the edge of a cliff, but we think that there's no way we're going over. It won't happen - we're America after all! We think we're invincible. We're being setup on many fronts - but are spiritually blind and can't see our enemy. The world is going to tell us who can save us from these 'terrorists'. The world will tell us who can restore financial stability. As Jesus told us - the father of lies is ruler of this world. Don't trust the world. Place your faith in God and His truth.
Also keep in mind that President Bush has signed many executive orders that give him what amounts to dictatorship powers in the event of another 'terrorist' event. I wonder why mainstream media never reports on these things? Do you see where this is going? This 'event' will trigger not only the loss of our freedom, but could very well be the trigger for a worldwide financial collapse. Based on what is at stake, who do you think will be behind this event? What do you think will emerge from this event? There are people walking around today that could tell you exactly what is planned.
Still not convinced? What do some of the men who helped created the Federal Reserve have to say on the subject?
It's time to stop focusing on our pursuit of worldly things. God is giving us signs everywhere - we're simply not paying any attention. This is going to change.
__________________________________________________
How Credit Got So Easy
And Why It's Tightening
August 7, 2007; Page A1
7/5/07
6/27/07
I have mentioned in previous articles how people who are focused on the world are likely to be greatly affected by negative events. This is especially true of wealthy people. As I’ve said before – if your life is focused squarely on money and that money is taken away – worldly people have nothing left to fall back on – no money equals no hope.
Our enemy is very good at setting people up by promising them everything and then delivering only misery. Follow him and you might live a life of privilege – for awhile. The problem is that he is in the business of killing, stealing and destroying – so any privilege or gain that might benefit you temporarily from following his ways – will eventually lead to your destruction. We are seeing this often as the financial crisis continues to erode wealth across the globe. We are beginning to see wealthy people lose their wealth – and their lives. I can hear the whispers - how will you survive? How will you feed your family? How will you deal with the humiliation? You have no power, no wealth – you are nothing – let me show you the way out. Instead of falling on their knees and asking God for help – they listen to our enemy – and seal their fate for eternity – which was the goal of our enemy from the beginning. As I have mentioned before – he knows his fate and he wants to take as many of us with him as possible.
I don’t know what else to say except – don’t believe our enemy’s lies. There is hope – but you won’t find what you’re looking for in this world. If you are on the edge of hopelessness – maybe at the point of giving up – you’ll need to trust me. It’s not a coincidence that you are reading this now. We can get out of this mess – but we can’t do it alone. Say a quiet prayer and ask God to come into your life and help you. Ask him to show you the truth and to give you faith and hope. Pray that we all turn away from our evil ways and focus on our Creator and His will for us. Ask him to shift your focus from the world – to Him.
There is a Heaven – and He wants you to be with Him there.
jg – January 7, 2009
JANUARY 7, 2009
His Empire in Tatters, German Billionaire Takes Life
By MIKE ESTERL
Wall St. Journal
FRANKFURT -- Adolf Merckle, one of Germany's wealthiest men, committed suicide after his family business empire began unraveling amid mounting debt, his family said Tuesday.
The suicide of the 74-year-old multibillionaire, whose holding company had roughly €30 billion, or $40 billion, in annual revenue, is one of several deaths of businesspeople tied to the global financial crisis.
The news of Mr. Merckle's suicide came after a consortium of about 30 creditor banks put the finishing touches on a bridge loan of roughly €400 million to the family holding company, VEM Vermögensverwaltung GmbH, which oversees dozens of firms in industries from drugs to cement.
But VEM had to hand over significant collateral to the banks as a prelude to a broader restructuring in the coming months that is expected to strip the holding company of many assets, said people familiar with the matter.
Mr. Merckle, who shied away from the spotlight, inherited his family's pharmaceutical company in the 1960s and expanded aggressively. He eventually controlled major stakes in Phoenix Pharmahandel, a German pharmaceutical wholesaler with about €20 billion in revenue; publicly listed HeidelbergCement AG, with more than €10 billion in sales; and generic drug maker Ratiopharm International GmbH, with about €2 billion in revenue.
But Mr. Merckle lost hundreds of millions of euros last year in misplaced stock-market bets, said people familiar with the matter. Much of the loss was tied to short positions in Volkswagen AG, in which he wagered that the stock price would fall. Instead, it skyrocketed late last year in what market participants have described as one of the most dramatic short squeezes ever. In a short squeeze, investors who were betting against a company are forced into the market to buy back stock after the price rises.
Bankers say Mr. Merckle also overstretched with highly leveraged acquisitions. He increased his indebtedness in 2007 when HeidelbergCement acquired U.K. building-materials company Hanson PLC for about £8 billion, or $11.6 billion. VEM confirmed late last year it was in refinancing talks with creditors.
HeidelbergCement's share price fell 6.2% Tuesday on Frankfurt's stock exchange to €31.26 a share. That is sharply off its 52-week high of €115.47 reached last March. Mr. Merckle increased his family firm's stake in Germany's largest cement company to about 80% in recent years.
Mr. Merckle's body was discovered Monday night near train tracks outside the southern German city of Ulm in what local police described Tuesday as a "railway accident." There are no signs that anyone else was to blame, they added in a statement.
His family said Tuesday that he had committed suicide. "The distress to firms caused by the financial crisis and the related uncertainties of recent weeks, along with the helplessness of no longer being able to act, broke the passionate family businessman, and he ended his life," the family said in a brief statement.
Refinancing talks with banks in recent weeks proved difficult because creditors were wary of extending VEM new funds without sizable guarantees and Mr. Merckle was reluctant to concede too much control, said people familiar with the matter. Talks were further complicated by the number of banks involved, they added.
In a rare interview last month, Mr. Merckle told the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung he had survived "many so-called stock-market crashes" but that he "couldn't calculate a banking and financial crisis of this dimension."
Mr. Merckle's wealth was estimated by Forbes magazine last year at $9.2 billion. VEM also owns stakes in companies making goods ranging from all-terrain vehicles to textiles.
In recent days, Ludwig Merckle, one of Mr. Merckle's four children, took the lead role for the family in negotiating the bridge loan with banks, according to a person familiar with the talks. Ludwig helped his father manage the investments through VEM, taking on an increasingly important role in recent years.
The roughly €400 million loan is designed to give VEM and creditors about three months to craft a broader restructuring blueprint for the Merckle family empire. But swift asset sales are expected to be difficult amid the tough market conditions. A VEM spokeswoman declined to comment Tuesday on any possible asset sales.
The dramatic fall of Mr. Merckle's business fortunes shocked many in Germany's financial community, where he enjoyed a reputation as a savvy investor.
Other Deaths
Thierry Magon de La Villehuchet, 65
Founder, Access International Advisors
Date of Death: Dec. 23
Workers discovered the body of Mr. de La Villehuchet in his firm's New York office. Mr. de La Villehuchet's firm oversaw a fund with assets invested by Bernard L. Madoff, according to a person familiar with the situation. An attorney for the firm told detectives that Mr. de La Villehuchet's firm had lost $1.5 billion in the Madoff scandal.
* * *
Alex Widmer, 52
Chief Executive, Bank Julius Baer
Date of Death: Dec. 3
Overseeing the private bank, Mr. Widmer turned the Zurich firm into a leading bank for wealthy clients. Julius Baer officials said Mr. Widmer's death wasn't linked to problems at the bank.
* * *
Kirk Stephenson, 47
Chief Operating Officer, Olivant Ltd.
Date of Death: Sept. 25
In late September, Mr. Stephenson drove to a rail station about 30 miles from his London home and stepped onto the tracks as an express train approached. Mr. Stephenson co-founded the investment firm in 2006. Olivant began accumulating a 2.8% stake in UBS and leading a revolt to turn around the Swiss banking giant. The UBS shares were put in a Lehman Brothers Holdings account with a proviso that allowed Lehman to use the assets as collateral. With Lehman in bankruptcy Olivant may never recover the assets.
One senior German banker described Mr. Merckle's business style as "down-to-earth and very cost-conscious." The billionaire businessman lived in Swabia, a region of Germany with a reputation for "frugality, where you turn every penny twice," and that's how Mr. Merckle was viewed by many investors, the banker added.
Mr. Merckle voiced distress about the rapidly changing opinions of his business dealings as reports surfaced in recent weeks about his debt problems. "We are being thrown into the same pot as hedge funds," he told Frankfurter Allegemeine Zeitung last month.
But he insisted that his holding company was suffering from a "pure liquidity problem" and that his focus had always remained building up solid businesses.
As Mr. Merckle grew increasingly desperate to keep his empire afloat, he lobbied the regional government in his home state of Baden-Württemberg late last year for temporary financial backing but was turned down.
German police said Mr. Merckle's family reported the businessman missing late Monday, "after he left the house in the afternoon and didn't return as usual." Around 7:30 the same night, a railroad worker noticed a body near Blaubeuren, where Mr. Merckle lived, police added in a statement Tuesday. Blaubeuren is about 100 miles west of Munich in southwestern Germany.
Mr. Merckle's death isn't the first linked to the financial crisis. French financier Thierry Magon de La Villehuchet, founder of Access International Advisors, was found dead in his Manhattan office just before Christmas. He reportedly lost $1.5 billion on behalf of customers in Bernard L. Madoff's alleged Ponzi scheme. Police, who called it an apparent suicide, found a box cutter as well as what appeared to be sleeping pills.
Earlier, an investment-fund executive at Olivant Ltd. in London and a veteran Bear Stearns Cos. manager in New York committed suicide.
Write to Mike Esterl at mike.esterl@wsj.com